Wednesday, January 8, 2020

Pouring Ice on FIRE

Over the past couple years there has been endless promotion of FIRE (Financial Independence, Retiring Early).  Many of the advocates outline how saving hard while minimizing expenses will allow you to retire early - often while you are only in your 30s. YouTube videos and media provide all the basic math showing stock market investments over a decade followed by a 4% withdrawal rate.

There are many positive concepts promoted by the FIRE movement including notions of minimizing debt, not buying new cars, investing in 401Ks and being frugal.  Some of these are generic ideas which make common sense for every generation.  Many of these concepts are covered in my "So You Want To Be a Millionaire" article from 2008 -- well before the FIRE movement appeared.

The primary short-coming of FIRE is that it does not consider all the possible events and complex (and likely) future scenarios.  In other words it is a simple "answer" for a "complex" problem.

Most FIRE promotional material do not account for the following:
  • Medical Insurance costs when no longer covered by your employer.
  • Medical Costs for serious illness (even when you have insurance it can be expensive)
  • Losing a partner (divorce or death)
  • Having Children (cost over $300,000 to raise each)
  • Marriage (many FIRE proposals assume you will forever be single)
  • Location issues (not being happy about where you moved for a low-cost lifestyle)
  • Social Security - not getting significant payments due to not working 35 years
There has been a slew of recent articles that covered some of the FIRE drawbacks (and benefits) including the question of what to do after "retiring". A few articles are provided below:


The real problem with FIRE is that it does not take into account all the possible future scenarios.  What happens if inflation greatly increases? (Most millennials have never experienced this). What is the consumer index on many core consumer  items goes up greatly?  What happens if the stock market greatly under-performs? 

Most FIRE articles assume that the stock market will continue to perform well over a decade period before you start withdrawing money.  What happens if the market sinks for a decade?  The primary failure of FIRE is that it does not plan for low, medium, and high scenarios in regards to market returns and inflation.  Most FIRE planning scenarios are too simplistic; at minimum you should create a spreadsheet with assumptions about market returns, savings rate, inflation, and your expenses.  This spreadsheet should be easily alterable so that you can plan a low, medium, and high scenario for review.  Plan across all possible scenarios.

Most FIRE scenarios assume a fixed 4% withdrawal rate.  Withdrawal rates are a complex problem without a single fixed answer.  Individuals must take a look at withdrawals in more detail.  One good source of information is - The Ultimate Guide to Safe Withdrawal Rates – Part 19: Equity Glidepaths in Retirement

One other item to note is that many FIRE plans promote saving with 401Ks and IRAs.  Using 401Ks is important to get an employer match (effectively free money). The one detail that FIRE articles fail to usually mention is that while 401Ks / IRAs are tax-protected -- there are significant penalties for early withdrawal. Usually you will not be able to withdraw this money (without penalties) until long after you retired early.

While I agree with many of the investing and savings concepts driving the FIRE movement, there is a need to pour some ICE on FIRE due to the lack of effective scenario planning and the failure to account for common life events.


Saturday, January 4, 2020

Welcome to 2020

The new decade has kicked off. Many economic headwinds remain in place including China tariffs, the U.S. manufacturing slowdown, an election year, and economic policy uncertainty.  A new heightened concern with events involving Iran in the Middle East is an addition to the list.

Despite the long bull run and macro-economic concerns that may tip over the stock indexes; the investment focus of Financial Insight will remain on long term planning for your personal economic future and how to ride out the market roller-coaster.

Over the upcoming weeks there will be articles that focus on:
  • Retirement Planning
  • 401K Diversification
  • FIRE (Financial Independence, Retire Early)
  • Stock Selection
  • Social Security Guidance

There has been a continual set of articles in the mainstream media in recent days that has greatly amused me.  The media has bombarded us with assertions implying that it is critical that you write "2020" as the year rather than "20" - otherwise scammers will take advantage of you on monetary instruments such as checks. Even misinformed police departments have joined in the fray. Several outlets provided an example of a scammer turning a check with "20" on it to "2017".  I don't see how altering the date on a check (or other instrument) to "2017" will aid a scammer.  Most likely it will only make the check non-despositable due to not being cashed for three years. Most checks are good for a mere 6 months.

Thursday, December 19, 2019

The 401K Diversification Article You MUST Read Today

My earlier Portfolio Diversification – 401K article provides an in-depth example of designing a diversified portfolio. I would urge everyone to read this previous comprehensive article today. It covers:
  • MPT (Modern Portfolio Theory)
  • Typical funds in corporate 401K plans
  • Hard truths about size
  • Active funds vrs. index funds
  • Fund selection
  • Risk Tolerance
  • Portfolios by Age and Risk Tolerance
  • Re-balancing
  • 401k and Diversification Resources

How has my 401K performed?

It has been over a decade since the 401K Portfolio Diversification post; in this time I have regularly re-balanced the 401k account and adjusted it as my age increased.   My 401K has performed in-line with the the market indexes and expectations. In areas where active funds were used rather than index funds; actively-managed Small Cap Funds (SSMVX and successors) have out performed the indexes. Actively-managed Bond Funds and Foreign Stock funds generally have under-performed their indexes.  The under-performance of Bond funds was impacted by the low interest rate environment.

I stuck with my 401K portfolio and am generally pleased with the results over time.

Tuesday, December 17, 2019

The Repo Market

What is the Repo Market?  No, it is not the guy coming to repossess your automobile for those overdue payments.

The Repo Market is where over $3 Trillion in debt is financed each day worldwide. Repo is short for repurchase agreements.  Most transactions are effectively collateralized overnight short-term loans.

The U.S. Fed uses the Repo Market to temporarily extend credit in tight markets. 

Back on September 16th the federal Repo offering froze up, creating panic and fear. There was a mismatch in cash flowing out with securities coming in; this created a crunch for those needing cash driving up interest rates to above 10% which were normally at 2%.

To address the problem the U.S. Fed load out $75 Billion a day in cash over 4 days until the markets settled down.

Many, including the Fed, concluded in the immediate aftermath that two transitory events collided: investors used repo to finance the purchase of a large batch of newly auctioned Treasuries at the same time that quarterly corporate tax payments drained liquidity from that market.  This combination of newly auctioned Treasuries and quarterly corporate tax payments is occurring this week again leading to a microscope being applied to the Repo market.

The BIS (Bank for International Settlements) issued a report outlining broader concerns about the U.S. Repo Market - September stress in dollar repo markets: passing or structural?

Four banks (Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo) that dominate the U.S Fed Repo market hold about 25% of the reserves in the U.S. banking system, but 50% of the Treasuries. This creates a concentration that is apt for problems. 

There are many financial pundits and media outlets outlining fears that the Fed Repo crisis may be a bigger issue in December, and the September events were only a preview.

In the recent weekend the U.S. Fed has added billions in liquidity in an attempt to forestall any potential crisis. CNBC and other outlets covered the Feds weekend purchase operations in depth. The New York Fed issued an unusual statement about repurchase operations

How will the situation shake out this week in December and in the upcoming year? Only time will tell.  It appears the U.S. Fed is attempting to get ahead of the situation by providing more cash liquidity before critical junctures.

Saturday, December 14, 2019

In Retrospective - 130/30 Funds

Back in 2007, 130/30 Funds were hyped as the next great thing in the market. As the market tumbled a dozen years ago the concept of a fund that would generate profits in both rising and falling markets was a sales pitch that hit appealed to the pain investors were encountering at this time.

Multiple mutual fund families immediately offered 130/30 Funds mirroring hedge funds. The mutual funds launched marketing campaigns in 2007 worked to draw in investors based on downside fear - many remembering the 2000/2001 decline. Some ads implied investors would profit greatly in both rising and falling markets.

As outlined earlier, 130/30 funds allow managers to short-sell up to 30% of their portfolios, and use the proceeds to buy an extra 30% long. The funds both use leverage and short-selling.

Now over a decade later - how have 130/30 Funds fared?   Back at that time I was very skeptical of 130/30 Funds. The results demonstrate I was quite right to question these 130/30 Funds as nothing more than a marketing gimmick with the intent of generating out sized fees for financial institutions.

Since 2008 the financial press has covered the decline of 130/30 Funds.   However now in 2019 as we seem to be approaching a market peak new 130/30 Funds are now again being offered.  One example is JPM and UBS unveil 130/30 funds.

A long list of media has demonstrated the gimmicks and decline of 130/30 Funds as they greatly under-performed the related index put forward by Andrew Lo of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Pankaj Patel of Credit Suisse and merely served as a payday for money managers.  A sampling of media 130/30 Fund articles include:

The decline, fall and afterlife of 130/30
https://www.ft.com/content/fdbf6284-b724-11e2-841e-00144feabdc0

130/30 Funds: 130% Gimmick/30% Good Idea
https://www.morningstar.com/articles/287506/13030-funds-130-gimmick30-good-ideak/30% Good Idea

130/30 Mutual Funds: Don’t Believe the Hype
https://investorsolutions.com/2012/09/28/13030-mutual-funds-dont-believe-the-hype-3/

A Hot Fund Design Turns Cold
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704388504575419642095323262


Now that 130/30 Funds are being pushed by brokerages again, don't fall for the hype. Stick with your long term investment plan with proper diversification, low fees, and a long term view.




Friday, December 13, 2019

How to get Rich in the Stock Market

There has been all sorts of media, companies and individuals pushing methods of "getting rich in the stock market".  The proposed strategies range from stock picking to trading, all the way out to using esoteric long/short hedging strategies with options & futures.

The reality is that there is only one guaranteed method to get rich in the stock market. It involves time, diversification, low-cost funds, continuous investment, and patience.

1) Time
The first factor is time; you will need to be focused on the long term.  Success in the stock market is not based on the next quarter or year, but the expectation for results over long periods of time akin to decades.

2) Diversification
It is important to be properly diversified based on your investment objectives, accepted risk tolerance, and time frames.  You should be diversified across domestic stocks, international stocks, growth/income, and company size.  The is also need for a balance between stocks, bonds, and other investments based on your age and objectives. There are many articles available that discuss proper diversification including - Why Diversification Is Important in Investing.

My earlier thoughts on 401K diversification can be found here - https://www.gregboop.com/2007/02/portfolio-diversification-401k.html

3) Low-cost Funds
Investment costs such as mutual fund fees can eat into a good portion of your returns over time.  Funds with high fees don't offer better returns over time than index funds -- in fact many times their returns are worse than index funds.  It is best to find mutual funds that mirror indexes offered from funds families such an Vanguard, Fidelity, and Schwab. Mutual Fund marketing fees, front end load fees, back end load fee and other assorted fees merely make financial people rich -- they don't help you are all. 

4) Continuous Investment
The market goes through many cycles.  By investing regularly - for example adding money each paycheck to a 401K or IRA - you are riding the cycle.  When the market pulls back you are buying more at lower cost; when the market rises you are making solid returns on what you have purchased over time.   Continuous investment provides a safety cushion for market cycles; it is a much better strategy than simply purchasing funds at one point in time.   If you buy at the peak with all of your cash it is a harder climb to get solid investment returns.

5) Patience
Be willing to hold on an ride out market cycles.  Do not panic when the market goes down.  Do not take a lot of money out simply because the market is up (trying to time the market).  You need to have a long term view and be patient.  Getting "rich" in the stock market is a long term "play" not something that happens by next year.